Photo via isportsweb.com |
This idea really comes in to play with regard to the team’s
defense. It’s no secret that the Indians were terrible defensively in 2014,
least of all to the people that put the team together. Chris Antonetti doesn’t
wake up one day, open up his laptop to Fangraphs,
and all of a sudden learn that his team is historically bad defensively. If
you know it and I know it and baseball writers across the internet know it,
then Chris Antonetti knows it, and he in all likelihood knew it before the rest
of us did.
That leads to the question of why would such an analytically
savvy front office put together a team it likely knew would be, if not
historically bad, at least one of the worst five to ten defensive units in the
league? And after a season in which the defense did turn out to be historically
bad, why would the same front office go into the following season with a
defense that still projects as a bottom ten unit?
Well, the answer is pretty obvious: strikeouts. Major League
Baseball has become a league dominated by strikeouts, and the Indians are at
the forefront. The league average strikeout rate has been trending upward year
over year for a while now.
Year
|
Strikeout Percentage
|
2014
|
20.4%
|
2013
|
19.9%
|
2012
|
19.8%
|
2011
|
18.6%
|
2010
|
18.5%
|
2009
|
18.0%
|
2008
|
17.5%
|
In 2014 the Indians tied the Tampa Bay Rays for the highest
team strikeout rate (23.4%). The Indians are also tied with the St. Louis
Cardinals for the lead through April 13 (27.2%), though that doesn’t mean a
whole lot considering it’s just a week of games.
Regardless, it’s pretty clear where the Indians are casting
their lot when it comes to run prevention. Whether it was by choice, by luck,
or some combination thereof, the Indians have taken up a strategy of using
pitchers who generate a lot of strikeouts and trying to put together a defense
that can merely be competent.
The strategy makes sense. The truth is that right now,
across the entirety of baseball, defense is less important than it was when
strikeouts rates were lower. That’s especially true for the Indians. Since less
balls are being put in play against them, it minimizes the potential impact,
both good and bad, the defense can have. A team like the Kansas City Royals is
reliant on converting batted balls into outs to support a pitching staff that
finished 25th in strikeout rate in 2014 (19.1%). The Indians can
reach the same place by racking up more strikeout and simply being adequate defensively.
The benefit of this kind of run prevention strategy can also
be seen in the team’s allocation of resources. This offseason the Indians were
able to acquire a major lineup upgrade in Brandon Moss. Rather than work to add
a major defensive upgrade in right field, they added Moss’ potent bat knowing
that his league-average or slightly worse defense in right field should be fine
when paired with the team’s pitching staff. The resource allocation flexibility
afforded by the young (read: cheap), strikeout-producing pitching staff is a
huge plus for a team operating at the Tribe’s payroll level.
Adequacy is the theme that has arisen for the Indians’
defense. They simply need adequate performances across the diamond. They need Michael
Bourn to be adequate in center field so that Michael
Brantley doesn’t have to be stretched in a role he’s not suited for.
They simply need Jose Ramirez
to be adequate at shortstop while Francisco
Lindor gains more experience in the minors. They simply need Jason Kipnis
and Lonnie
Chisenhall to be adequate in the infield so they can keep their bats in
the lineup every day.
Save for catcher, the Indians probably don’t have a great
defensive player at any position. But the standard for what the Indians’
defense needs to be isn’t the same as it is for other teams. By a combination
of good planning, good coaching, and a little bit of fortune, the Indians have
built a pitching staff that can rack up the punchouts. Simply adequate team
defense behind them should be enough to complete the run prevention equation.
0 comments :
Post a Comment